Formaldehyde vs. PFAS in Beauty Products: Why Scientific Accuracy Matters
What Is Formaldehyde and How Is It Being Addressed in Policy?
Formaldehyde is a volatile organic compound (VOC) that may be present in or released from certain hair straightening and smoothing products, particularly when heat is applied during application.
In 2026, federal legislation known as the Healthy Hair Act (H.R. 7685) was introduced to address the risks associated with this category of products.
The bill, introduced by Ayanna Pressley, Shontel Brown, and Nydia Velázquez, proposes to:
Ban formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing substances
Classify these products as “adulterated” under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Strengthen protections against exposure to harmful chemicals in personal care products
Understanding Exposure
Exposure to formaldehyde can vary depending on:
Product formulation
Frequency of use
Application method
Environmental conditions such as heat and ventilation
However, modern public health and regulatory frameworks do not evaluate risk based on isolated exposure alone.
They consider:
Repeated use over time
Cumulative exposure
Occupational exposure in salon environments
Public Health Focus
The Healthy Hair Act reflects growing concern around:
The cumulative impact of repeated exposure to formaldehyde in hair treatments
Occupational exposure among salon professionals
Disproportionate exposure linked to products marketed primarily to Black women
Rather than focusing on a single exposure event, the legislation addresses patterns of use and risk over time, which are central to modern approaches to cosmetic safety.
This is why policy interventions like the Healthy Hair Act are critical, because ingredient safety cannot rely on awareness alone, but must be addressed through enforceable standards.
What Are PFAS and Why Are They Called “Forever Chemicals”?
PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are a group of synthetic organic compounds engineered to resist water, oil, and heat. Their high stability means they do not break down easily, allowing them to persist in the environment and in the human body over time
In cosmetics, PFAS may be used to:
Improve product spreadability
Enhance long-wear performance
Create smooth, uniform finishes
They are commonly associated with:
Long-wear makeup
Waterproof products
Certain lotions and creams
PFAS are often referred to as “forever chemicals” because they:
Do not break down easily in the environment
Can persist in water, soil, and the human body
May accumulate over time with repeated exposure
This persistence has made PFAS a growing focus in environmental health research, including studies supported by the National Institutes of Health.
Understanding the Difference: Formaldehyde vs. PFAS
These two are often mentioned together, but they are fundamentally different in how they function, how people are exposed, and how they are regulated.
1. Type
Formaldehyde:
A single compound (with related compounds that release it over time).
This makes it easier to study, identify, and regulate in specific products.PFAS:
A large class of thousands of organic compounds.
This makes regulation more complex because it involves an entire group, not just one substance.
2. Function in Beauty Products
Formaldehyde:
Primarily linked to hair smoothing and straightening treatments, where it may be released during use, especially with heat.PFAS:
Used to enhance product performance, such as:Waterproofing
Long wear
Smooth texture
3. Key Concern
Formaldehyde:
The concern centers on direct exposure, particularly:Repeated use
Occupational exposure (e.g., salon workers)
PFAS:
The concern is persistence and accumulation, meaning:They don’t break down easily
They can build up in the body and environment over time
4. Exposure Focus
Formaldehyde:
Exposure is tied to specific use settings, such as:Applying hair treatments
Inhalation during salon services
PFAS:
Exposure is broader and more diffuse:Through multiple products
Over long periods
Including environmental pathways (water, soil, etc.)
5. Policy Approach
Formaldehyde:
Addressed through targeted bans in specific use cases, such as the Healthy Hair Act (H.R. 7685), which focuses on hair straightening products.PFAS:
Requires broader regulatory strategies, including:Environmental oversight
Multi-industry regulation
Ongoing scientific review
Formaldehyde and PFAS are not interchangeable.
Formaldehyde and PFAS are not interchangeable.
One is a specific compound tied to defined use cases and exposure scenarios
The other is a broad class of persistent organic compounds with long-term environmental and health considerations.
Understanding this difference is essential for:
Accurate public health conversations
Effective policy
Meaningful progress in cosmetic safety
Why Scientific Accuracy Matters
As awareness around ingredient safety grows, so does the risk of oversimplification.
Grouping all “potentially harmful substances” together, without understanding their classification, creates confusion and weakens meaningful public health dialogue.
Scientific accuracy matters because it:
Supports informed consumer decision-making
Strengthens credible advocacy efforts
Enables targeted, effective regulation
Prevents misinformation from undermining progress
Effective cosmetic safety reform depends on precision, not generalization.
The Public Health and Policy Context
Consumers today use multiple personal care products daily, often resulting in repeated and cumulative exposure to a wide range of potentially harmful ingredients and substances
This is particularly important when considering:
Frequency of use
Product layering
Long-term exposure patterns
Certain populations, including salon professionals and individuals using specific categories of beauty products, may experience higher exposure over time.
This is why modern policy efforts, including the Safer Beauty Bill Package, are focused on:
Strengthening ingredient oversight
Increasing transparency
Aligning cosmetic safety standards with current science
Read more: Safer Beauty Bill Package — What It Is and Why It Matters
Why Misinformation Slows Progress
Inaccurate or imprecise discussions about ingredients can:
Distract from real risks
Undermine scientific credibility
Confuse consumers and policymakers
Delay meaningful regulatory change
Public health conversations require:
Clear definitions
Evidence-based frameworks
Responsible communication
Without these, progress becomes fragmented, and less effective.
Clean Beauty Coalition Position
At the Clean Beauty Coalition, our work is grounded in science, policy, and public health.
We do not generalize ingredient risk.
We:
Identify
Differentiate
Educate
Advocate
Based on evidence.
Our mission is to ensure that conversations around beauty and personal care products are accurate, transparent, and aligned with modern regulatory and public health standards.
Explore our advocacy work
What Consumers Should Take Away
Understanding ingredient safety starts with clarity.
Not all potentially harmful substances are the same, and understanding those differences matters.
Consumers should ask:
What category does this ingredient belong to?
How is it used?
What does the research say about exposure and risk over time?
Better questions lead to better decisions, and stronger outcomes for public health.
Closing
As awareness grows, so does responsibility.
Advancing safer beauty requires more than identifying concerns, it requires understanding them with clarity, accuracy, and intention.
Because meaningful progress, in science, policy, and public health, depends on getting the facts right.
Sources
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — Cosmetic Safety Resources
https://www.fda.gov/cosmeticsNational Institutes of Health (NIH) — Environmental Health Research (PFAS)
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/pfc/index.cfmInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) — Carcinogen Classifications (Formaldehyde)
https://monographs.iarc.who.int/list-of-classificationsEnvironmental Health Perspectives — PFAS Research
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/